Scott Kay Regal Engagement Ring

The evolution of income inequality in France

L are income inequalities have increased over the last ten years. The average annual income of 10% smaller than 970 euro rose between 1998 and 2008, one of the richest 10% of 11 530 euros.

L e trial that can be worn on income inequality depends on the time scale and the measuring instrument that is used. Contrary to a widespread view, the question is not "doing what we want to say numbers", but agree on both observation dates and tools. ( following )

Whay Day Does Ernie Draw

Bollard Solar water


L has distribution of drinking water is a huge challenge, which we know is not that desert regions. Population density and hygiene conditions are obviously a factor of population health, quality of water being the first item to be insured. Often this water is available in quantity, but its purification requires major investments. This is where the terminal could intervene Biosun , sold 3500 euros by the French company BIO-UV specialist of water treatment, ultra violet. This terminal independent treatment of water, is adapted to situations of poverty, meeting the needs of securing microbiological water, with the main objective of eliminating waterborne diseases, which thrive particularly in peri-urban poor . ( following )

How To Sketch A Car Accident

A track resistance

L Article 11 of the Constitution was revised in 2008, there is a way to compel the President of the Republic to propose a referendum on pensions, provided that the referendum is proposed by 1 / 5 of parliament, themselves supported by 1 / 10 voters (we ).

P o memory, even if the pension reform should be adopted by the Senate and National Assembly, all is not lost, the law can not be applied. There is still time to make every effort to oppose the pension reform.

Here is the link to sign this appeal: http://www.referendumretraites.org/

A track should not be overlooked!

Home Stereo Recievers

The 4 Lies of the Right on pensions


D ince the introduction of this bill, the Right of cons strikes us-truths that ultimately have one goal: to make us swallow pill.

1) "We live longer, a quarter more per year for 50 years, it is normal to work more. " FALSE. That life expectancy in good health to be taken into account, and there is 64 for women, 63 men for 59 years for workers.

2) "We now have 1.8 contributors for a retiree, and it will be more that 1.2 co-tisants in recent years, there will no longer fund our pension system" FALSE. Calculate as it is to deny the growth and wealth sharing. Even with low growth, the GDP will double in 50 years. The "1.2" becomes 2.4 contributors for a retiree. It doubles not enough, a better distribution of wealth for employees to ultimately increase the return on contributions.

3) "All European countries have rejected the legal age of retirement, we are in the same scenarios themselves. " FALSE. To say this is to deny that our fertility rate of 2.09 children per woman is far superior to the other: 1.6 average in the EU. And it is not because others have regressed socially we must do the same!

4) "We do not want to lower the amount of pensions." FALSE. The cons-successive reforms since 2003 have reduced pensions average 22%. It is always difficult to validate all quarters and this is not reform-Sarkozy-Fillon Woerth that will fix things by increasing the contribution period! ( following )